- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:56:08 +0100
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> writes: > Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: > >> But still, people (with the exception of Paul Graham) stopped using <table> for layouts > > if only that were true, take a look at https://www.google.co.uk or grep the > html data available from http://webdevdata.org Thanks for pointing out that my assumption was unfounded. I am downloading one of the data sets right now. >>Also, Faulkner wanting "an example of canvas to make accessible" ... seems > like circular reasoning to me to use that as an example why >we need an > accessible canvas. > > ? 1. A wants to demonstrate how technology X can do Y. 2. B: „because A wants to demonstrate how X does Y, we need X to do Y“. reduces to: 3. “X should do Y because someone wants to show how X can do Y.” Am I misunderstanding the argument by a large margin? ?Btw, I have actually read some of your posts regarding <canvas> accessability and am aware you list quite a lot of arguments.) -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Received on Saturday, 22 February 2014 14:56:36 UTC