On 2/20/14 11:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > (If people used rAF for what it was *intended* for, we could probably > have stopped firing it *entirely* when the window isn't visible. We do. At least Chrome and Firefox do. > Instead, we had to compromise with the 1s refresh rate instead.) That's what Chrome and Firefox do for setTimeout/setInterval. -BorisReceived on Thursday, 20 February 2014 17:01:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:16 UTC