- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:04:14 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:11:32 +0100, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: > On 05/02/2014 13:24, Simon Pieters wrote: >> >> Is there a situation in which it is conforming to use html:title >> outside the <head> in a document where the root is html:html? In >> math:annotation-xml? > > > My reading is yes, and validator.nu at least agrees this is valid > > <!DOCTYPE html> > <html> > <head><title>k</title> > </head> > <body> > aaa > <math> > <semantics> > <mi>x</mi> > <annotation-xml encoding="text/html"><title>??</title></annotation-xml> > </semantics> > </math> > </body> > </html> > > but unlike the svg case MathML doesn't have any special requirements > here, and I don't think it would cause problems if any convenient (for > you) behaviour was defined, or this was declared invalid (and for > example the valid content of annotation-xml encoding="text/html" was the > same as that of html <body>) Yeah, I think that the content model for annotation-xml with encoding="text/html" or encoding="application/xhtml+xml" should be flow content. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 15:04:47 UTC