- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 02:53:33 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: atwilson@chromium.org, Robert Bīndar <robertbindar@gmail.com>, whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, Michael Henretty <michael.henretty@gmail.com>, Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> I don't see a problem with firing events on all Notification >> instances, and only changing focus if none of the events were >> cancelled. > > It's a somewhat complex design compared to what we probably need long > term, if long term is service workers. I'm not convinced that even with SW, the proper design is to tell websites to always funnel click notifications through a SW. Alternatively we don't use events here at all. Instead we could use a .clicked property which returns a promise. This is a typical "one shot" notification where Promises are better suited than DOM Events. However I don't actually think that firing events on multiple EventTargets is that complex. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2014 09:54:27 UTC