- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:20:58 -0700
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > The reason I didn't make it a boolean was because of the IPC involved and because I wanted to support multiple types of locks without needing to add new attributes in the future (and if we need to add the complex stuff later). What's the problem with adding more attributes in the future? That said, I do think that a "timeout" for screen locks make sense, so a boolean wouldn't work. Though not as a timeout for when to release the lock, but rather as a "minimum time I'd like to keep the screen awake" as described at http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2014-August/297423.html / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 01:21:54 UTC