- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:04:40 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Rik Cabanier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > > > > > Pinch-zoom is hard because we don't want to trigger reflows or other > > > expensive behavior on pinch-zoom. I'd leave pinch-zoom out of it for > > > now. > > > > Unless I'm missing something fundamental, changing the pixel density > > doesn't cause a layout, it's changing the width that causes a layout. > > It will do a layout if the width is directly or indirectly dependent on > the CSS pixelratio. For instance, notice how the text boxes reflow if > you change the page zoom: http://jsfiddle.net/BtAK7/1/ Sure. But pinch-zoom doesn't change the width. (Page zoom does.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 20:05:10 UTC