- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 23:00:53 -0700
- To: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
- Cc: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Thanks for taking this to the group! Dominic's patch for Chrome is almost identical to the one I provided for WebKit, including the synchronous drawing of the ring. see: https://codereview.chromium.org/19786002/ The accessibility backed of chrome doesn't scroll like the one in WebKit and FireFox which is why we're seeing a difference in behavior. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 16, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > > >> WCAG 2.0 claims that "many platforms allow the user to customize the > >> rendering of this focus indicator", though I admit that I don't see any > >> references for this claim: > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-TECHS/G165.html > >> > >> IBM similarly claims "users may customize the default indicator in > Windows > >> to a brighter color": > >> > >> > http://www-03.ibm.com/able/guidelines/web/webfocusvisible_aa.html#tech3 > >> > >> I haven't been able to support those claims. However, Win32 in > particular > >> has some APIs for changing focus rings (see below for references). > >> > > > > If the user changes the focus ring's color and/or width, then > > drawSystemFocusRing should draw using that style. > > > > The issue is when the application wants to draw its own focus ring - > should > > the system sometimes override that and draw its own focus ring instead? > > That's the argument I don't buy. > > > > Respecting the system focus ring color but ignoring the rest of the > system > > palette makes no sense. Suppose the user has chosen white-on-black text > > with a yellow focus ring. The canvas normally draws a black-on-white GUI > > with red focus rings that are really easy to see. If the canvas calls > > drawCustomFocusRing and the system draws its yellow focus ring instead, > it > > will actually be worse. So drawing the custom focus ring, in the absence > of > > the rest of the information about the system palette, is not necessarily > an > > improvement at all. > > > > I think this feature was proposed with the best of intentions by people > who > > misinterpreted how Windows system colors and styles work, and didn't > think > > through all of the implications. > > > > I am totally in favor of trying to provide a better experience for users > > who want a high-contrast theme and custom focus rings - I just don't > think > > this API is the way to achieve that goal, and I think it would actually > > make things worse if user agents implemented it as specified. > > > > Perhaps this shouldn't even be solved as part of canvas. Maybe we should > > add web apis to indicate that the user prefers a custom color scheme that > > could be used for rendering the whole page, not just canvas. > > > > The name isn't ideal, it's true. I don't know what a better name should > >> be, though. It's really "let me know if I should draw a focus ring, and > if > >> I should, then take the opportunity to also notify the accessibility > >> tools", which doesn't make for a very pithy method name. > >> > > > > What would you call it if it never draws, but just notifies the UI? I > think > > we could call it notifyFocusRingPath or something like that. Or we go > with > > the scrollPathIntoView idea. > > or something like defineFocusableRegion/defineFocusableArea. > > I'd much refer names that signify the fact these functions define > focusable area/region than the fact > it may draw the focus ring if the element is already focused since authors > need to call this function > on all focusable elements that are currently visible on the canvas. > > If we were to implement this API in WebKit, I don't think we'll draw the > focus ring synchronously either > (i.e. our implementation will be similar to what Dominic said Chrome does). > > - R. Niwa > >
Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 06:01:18 UTC