W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2013

Re: [whatwg] Canvas in workers

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:12:22 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZBBNX6sDxUkhUCyv2znvbUDBMHLKcKvCXM764Dmrf0OA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Novosad <junov@google.com>
Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>, David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Justin Novosad <junov@google.com> wrote:

> rAF doesn't work in a worker, but that is easy to work around. You can
> have a rAF handler on the main thread that propagates the signal to your
> workers by posting a "rAF" message to them.
>

That isn't a good solution since it forces the app to drop frames if the
main thread is blocked.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 22:12:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:12 UTC