On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:52:49 +0200, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: >> You'd actually write "CSS.escape", so that's basically the longer, >> different name. Is that sufficient? > > > I don't want to bikeshed over this, but I was thinking of perhaps > serializeIdent(), or escapeIdent(). The API is intended to be used for escaping CSS strings too. Also, I think most Web developers don't think in terms of CSS tokens. Serialize seems a bit wrong since the input isn't an object. -- Simon Pieters Opera SoftwareReceived on Monday, 14 October 2013 20:39:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:11 UTC