- From: James Burke <jrburke@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:27:18 -0700
- To: Andrew Wilson <atwilson@google.com>
- Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Andrew Wilson <atwilson@google.com> wrote: > So, I'm not entirely sure how many lessons taken from the FirefoxOS > implementation are applicable to the API for web pages in general, but I > agree that "what do we do if the user clicks on a notification after the > parent page has been closed" is a bit of an unsolved/unsolveable problem > with the current API. Hopefully the mobile focus of FirefoxOS points to likely issues for any browser on mobile. For example, I can see where it will be common for mobile browsers to do some sort of web page quiescence, even a full close, maybe just saving a screenshot of the tab, for memory concerns, even if the user still considers the tab "open". I expect the majority of browser use over time will fit into devices that fit the "mobile space" definition vs desktop space definition. > I dimly recall seeing an email thread proposing adding some kind of click > URL to a notification (and my search-fu is not strong enough to find a link > to it, sadly), which seems like it would address some of the issues you have > with the current API (encoding data that can be passed back to the app on a > notification click, even if the app has been closed in the meantime). The > solution I've seen implemented on the web (shutdown notifications when a web > page is closed) clearly doesn't work for a platform like FirefoxOS which > does memory management and app shutdown behind the scenes. An URL could work too (our hack right now is to attach data to the imageURL for the notification and read that data), but I still I prefer using a data object for the data of the notification. The notification object could have an URL associated with it, and the browser would open the URL if it did not already have a tab/process for it, then send a data message to it, but if the URL was already open, just send a data message to it with the notification object. In that approach the URL would not have querystring args, and the browser would match the URL to the URLs of existing opened tabs/apps, but without the query string or fragment ID to find a match. This would allow an already open page to handle multiple notification clicks via an entry point message handler discussed in the first post on this thread. In the cases of memory conscious browsers, it could rehydrate the tab that was currently tracked for that URL, and it would still work without needing to maintain closure state as compared to the notification.onclick/onclose route currently specified. James
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 00:27:43 UTC