W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2013

Re: [whatwg] Simplified <picture> element draft

From: Kornel Lesiński <kornel@geekhood.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:29:48 -0000
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>
Message-ID: <op.w675vyy6te2ec8@aimac.local>
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:48:56 -0000, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

> You introduce a proxy that needs to be tested to see that it works in  
> different scenarios (e.g. removing an attribute, that events are  
> forwarded properly, that it does not affect parts it shouldn't like  
> document.images, that the context menu works, etc.).
> You introduce a (or two) new fallback mechanism.
> You haven't specified that <picture> should be able to be drawn on a  
> canvas in 2d (and WebGL?).

Thanks, very good examples. Now I understand (although I wish specifying  
it "exactly like <img>" would make that easy enough).

regards, Kornel
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 20:30:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:14 UTC