W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2013

Re: [whatwg] Simplified <picture> element draft

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:33:33 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJE5ia8g7GWHYPNch_1+t9wjnG5fwbhHB-xg0YnhW7s7ENbvwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kornel Lesiński <kornel@geekhood.net>
Cc: whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Timothy Hatcher <timothy@apple.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
I'm trying to sort out from the many messages on this topic which
proposal I should read in detail.  Is the one linked below the one
that people are most excited about?  I'm I correct in understand that
this proposal contains srcset as a subcomponent?


On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Kornel Lesiński <kornel@geekhood.net> wrote:
> I've written down proposal for the simplified source selection algorithm:
> http://geekhood.net/picture-element.html
> This also includes variant of the idea from the recent "<picture> redux"
> proposal to use an actual <img> element as the basis for the <picture>
> element definition.
> This draft doesn't include all features of src-N *yet*, but I expect this to
> be added either via extended srcset syntax to something like <source sizes>
> once there's consensus how to approach this.
> To simplify implementation even further I've allowed UAs to flatten fallback
> DOM to a plaintext string (in case they need to emulate <img alt> for
> existing screen readers or accessibility APIs).
> I've dropped usemap. It could be added, but I'm not sure if there is need
> for it.
> I've specified very few IDL attributes. This area may need to be extended.
> --
> regards, Kornel
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 07:34:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:14 UTC