- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 21:57:35 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 11/22/13 9:41 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > Sure, <option>s are replaced elements either. You mean aren't? Except in UAs where they seem to be, right? For what it's worth, <select> didn't use to be in Gecko either, in this sense, until we made it so in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591619 > I agree that it's vaguer than ideal, and it might be wrong, but it's not > _that_ vague. It says "An element whose content is outside the scope of > the CSS formatting model", and <button>s contents aren't outside the scope > of the CSS formatting model. It seems pretty cut and dry to me. Is <svg:foreignObject> a replaced element? Why or why not? Maybe my point is that this definition has little to do with what UAs are actually doing... > Well, then we should fix CSS. Imo, yes. -Boris
Received on Saturday, 23 November 2013 02:58:04 UTC