- From: Bruno Racineux <bruno@hexanet.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 20:53:16 -0800
- To: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
On 11/18/13 8:21 PM, "Ilya Grigorik" <igrigorik@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Bruno Racineux <bruno@hexanet.net> wrote: >> Because these (only 0.2% uzing gzip) stats do not look good at all in >> support of your theoretical argument: >> http://trends.builtwith.com/Server/GZIP-Module > > That measures "mod_gzip" adoption. > > HTTP Archive tracks top 300K (Alexa) sites, and the actual number has been > hovering ~70-75% for a long time: > http://httparchive.org/trends.php#perCompressed > > </aside> I suspected I was missing something. Though httparchive stats are "number of compressed responses over the number of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript requests" which is different that a per website coverage. Correct? I assumed the mod_gzip sits looks at the: 'Content-Encoding:gzip ' header. Or what else could it look at? Wouldn't this mean that low end site not in the top 300K on Alexa have a much higher non-gzipped rate?
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 04:53:47 UTC