W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2013

Re: [whatwg] <imgset> responsive imgs proposition (Re: The src-N proposal)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:00:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDU3Mo9A=SyOpq92fdLqTzHv4OyhEnj3EM1zDmMpZ8_+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Cc: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>, Markus Ernst <derernst@gmx.ch>, whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:
> Do you have an alternative proposal aside from src-N?  Recall that
> src-N has been rejected by WebKit and therefore is no longer viable.

Hey, WebKit, what's your answer if we just take src-N and use a ||
separator to cram them all into a single attribute?  Otherwise
identical proposal; none of this "gradually expand srcset" thing.

I think this is a terrible idea, and plenty of actual authors agree
with me, but if multiple attributes is the one thing that's acting as
a deal-killer for implementors, then screw it, we can mitigate the
pain with an OM later.  May god have mercy on our souls, etc.

Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 23:01:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:14 UTC