W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2013

Re: [whatwg] <imgset> responsive imgs proposition (Re: The src-N proposal)

From: matmarquis.com <mat@matmarquis.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:25:20 -0500
Message-Id: <CA3661E7-3D1F-4422-AD49-05FF9CA7611A@matmarquis.com>
To: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>
Cc: Markus Ernst <derernst@gmx.ch>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>

On Nov 15, at 12:27 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote:

>>> 
>>> Any thoughts on my concerns with making inline CSS mandatory (especially
>>> from the CSP angle)?
>> 
>> CSP 1.1 supports securing inline style and script with nonces and/or
>> hashes.
>> 
>> 
> OK, since the latest proposals keep the URLs outside the style, modifying
> the content image can keep the same style, assuming layout is identical. So
> these inline-style are not more likely to change than any other
> inline-styles and the authoring complexity is identical to other inline
> styles.
> 
> Still - I'm not sure such a solution is author friendly.


Iím just not sure what this proposal claims to handle or support that `src-n` doesnít, apart from handling it with a slightly different syntax thatís subjectively preferred by a few people? Seems like it depends on a number of fairly large assumptions, but doesnít really bring anything new to the table.
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 18:21:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:14 UTC