- From: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:00:16 +0000
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Cc: Markus Ernst <derernst@gmx.ch>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:
>
> My apologies. I thought Christian Biesinger addressed all these
> concerns with his proposal:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Christian Biesinger
> <cbiesinger@google.com> wrote:
> > For a bit more presentation, and while we're inventing new syntax
> > anyway, how about this:
> >
> > <style>
> > @media (min-width: 480px) {
> > .artdirected { content: replaced url(attr(src-small)); }
> > }
> > @media (min-width: 600px) {
> > .artdirected { content: replaced url(attr(src-medium)); }
> > }
> > @media (min-width: 800px) {
> > .artdirected { content: replaced url(attr(src-big)); }
> > }
> > </style>
> > ...
> > <img class="artdirected" src="foo.jpg" src-small="foo-small.jpg"
> > src-medium="foo-medium.jpg" src-big="foo-big.jpg">
>
> Specifically, his approach uses an <img> element, which addresses all
> four of Maciej's concerns.
>
You're right, Maciej's concerns were addressed by Christian's proposal (and
John's followup proposal).
Any thoughts on my concerns with making inline CSS mandatory (especially
from the CSP angle)?
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 17:00:41 UTC