- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:29:57 -0800
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> Does this mean that ctx.currentPath != ctx.currentPath? > >> > >> Yes > >> > >>> That's bad! > >> > >> Why would it be bad (apart from being different)? > >> > > > > It's strange to say "foo.bar.baz = 1" (ctx.currentPath.baz = 1), and for > > foo.bar.baz to not be 1 the next time you look. It's also confusing if > you > > use it as a Map key. > > I think the problem that the UA would be focused with is the following: > > var path = ctx1.currentPath; > ctx2.currentPath = path; > > or simply > > ctx2.currentPath = ctx1.currentPath > > Both contexts could manipulate the same path and both can have different > CTMs which also change independent of each other. Mixing that up could > cause a huge mess. > > That is one of the reasons why WebKit creates copies. > Yes, but the code should have been: ctx2.SetCurrentPath(ctx1.getCurrentPath()); which arguably doesn't look as elegant.
Received on Monday, 4 November 2013 19:30:26 UTC