- From: Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 09:49:53 -0400
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
Explain further why you don't recommend ABNF for this case. You should also explain whether another change to make section 9 more readable is appropriate (though it currently is relatively readable as is). --Peter -----Original Message----- From: Anne van Kesteren Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:15 AM To: Peter Occil Cc: WHATWG Subject: Re: [whatwg] An alternative approach to section 9 of Mime Sniffing On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com> wrote: > I would appreciate comments. The only reason Fetch uses ABNF is to match HTTP(-bis) conventions. It's not a practice I recommend copying for non-header value definitions. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 13:50:28 UTC