W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2013

Re: [whatwg] Iframe IDL sandbox readonly attribute

From: Marta Pawlowska <m.pawlowska@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:12:48 +0200
To: 'Boris Zbarsky' <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Message-id: <00cc01ce5624$e471d5c0$ad558140$%pawlowska@samsung.com>
Hello Boris,
Thank you very much for your answer. I did noticed PushForward and this was
my suspect. However it is hard for me to understand why to use readonly in
that case?  Do you know any place/list/ling where such a concept "readonly +
PutForwards" is described? 

Best regards,
Marta


-----Original Message-----
From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Boris Zbarsky
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:57 PM
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Iframe IDL sandbox readonly attribute

On 5/21/13 6:31 AM, Marta Pawlowska wrote:
> [PutForwards=value] readonly attribute

Note the PutForwards bit.

> I've prepared TC where I change sandbox value and it can be changes with
> most browsers.

Yes, because of the PutForwards.

Though note that at least Gecko implements this as a writable DOMString 
for now, because of the issues I raised in the mail you cite.

-Boris
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 13:13:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:59 UTC