W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2013

Re: [whatwg] Priority between <a download> and content-disposition

From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 09:57:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CABirCh8xiSnf-Dq08mZNTKLtnkfcq+Gu_F5+p4FLq2Wk_vcDAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>wrote:

> 1) Content-Disposition: inline
>> 2) Content-Disposition: inline; filename="B.txt"
>> 3) Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="B.txt"
>> People generally seem to have a harder time with getting header data
>> right, than getting markup right, and so I think that in all cases we
>> should display the "save as" dialog (or display equivalent download
>> UI) and suggest the filename "A.txt".
> I agree that people have problems getting headers right, but in all the
> cases above, it seems they have set the header on purpose, no?
> My recollection was that a/@download was mainly added for cases where the
> header field couldn't be set at all...

When I use #2, I'm just setting the filename.  "inline" is only there
because it has to be; there's no way of saying "Content-Disposition: don't
care; filename=foo".  "inline" is the default.

I think @download should be able to force a download regardless of whether
a C-D header exists: treat the default C-D as "inline", and don't change
behavior just because a header states the default.

I don't know if it should be able to override a C-D filename parameter.  I
can't think of any case where this is useful, so if it helps get this
feature available cross-origin then that's fine.  (Half of the point of
this feature is to allow adjusting filenames on external content servers
which you don't have much control over.)

Glenn Maynard
Received on Sunday, 17 March 2013 14:57:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:56 UTC