- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 10:28:20 +1300
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Cc: "Kang-Hao \(Kenny\) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>, 王铁套 <wang.tietao@outlook.com>, WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>
I actually just wrote a patch to implement the spec behavior in Firefox. I think changing behavior from "throw" to "not throw" shouldn't have any compatibility concerns. I also think that "not throw" is better here than throwing; it's simpler to not distinguish "finished downloading but decoding failed" from "download in progress (but very slow perhaps)". In fact I question why the spec has us throw for zero-sized canvas source. It would seem to me to be simpler/better to just not draw and not throw in that case also. Rob -- Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]
Received on Friday, 1 March 2013 21:28:46 UTC