- From: Rick Waldron <waldron.rick@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:32:43 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Justin Novosad <junov@google.com>, WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Justin Novosad <junov@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl > >wrote: > >> I think something like > >> > >> interface ImageBitmap { > >> static Promise create(ImageBitmapSource image, optional long sx, > >> long sy, long sw, long sh); > >> }; > >> > >> would be much nicer. > > > > I agree it would be nicer, but it seems less consistent with other > existing > > APIs. > > There's really no consistency here anyway, and the > "Interface.create()" idiom is pretty easy and nice. > > I wonder - perhaps we can call the function "new"? Dunno which name is > better. > Can I ask that you steer clear of that? There has been discussion of possibly providing static .new() on built-ins that produce instances without new operator. I dont know where that stands, but of course it wouldn't be revisited until ES7. It would be nice if that wasn't DOA due to web-breakage. Thanks. Rick > > ~TJ >
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 22:33:29 UTC