W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2013

Re: [whatwg] Questions regarding Path object

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:15:57 +0200
Message-ID: <51C0416D.2060905@opera.com>
To: Jürg Lehni <lists@scratchdisk.com>
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
On 6/17/13 11:42 PM, Jürg Lehni wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2013, at 16:17 , Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I like the following naming scheme, as it is really short and already familiar for people from the Java world, but I can imagine that a prefix would be preferred.
>> Path2D, Shape2D, Gradient2D, Matrix2D
>> Path2d and Shape2d sound reasonable. I don't think there's a immediate need to harmonize gradients so we probably want to keep CanvasGradient.
> Do you prefer the lowercase 'd' instead of the uppercase 'D'?
CanvasRenderingContext2D has it uppercase.

Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 11:14:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:00 UTC