W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2013

Re: [whatwg] 2D canvas feature proposal: text decoration

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 08:36:00 +0400
To: "David Dailey" <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.wyb06ar9y3oazb@dhcp-218-192-wifi.yandex.net>
Cc: Justin Novosad <junov@google.com>, WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:48:54 +0400, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>  

> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:37 PM, David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>  
> wrote:
>> You know, I'm not quite sure why we have text in canvas at all. It's not
>> really text you know -- it's just a bunch of pixels. You can't select  
>> it,
>> you can't copy it to the clipboard, it's not accessible without a bunch  
>> of
>> effort that authors generally don't use. It's generally illegal in most
>> civilized places. Why not use SVG? It's got text decoration. Text is  
>> text.
>> It's just that the more conspiratorial and selfish of the browser  
>> vendors
>> back when things were being voted on seemed to push canvas since they
>> already owned it and SVG seemed "hard" and like they might have to learn
>> something by way of graphics in their corporate portfolios.
>> That's how I see it, anyhow. WHATWG doesn't vote, of course.
> "text ... is generally illegal in most civilized places"
> What is this i don't even

Using canvas for serious rendering of text is generally...



Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 23:36:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:00 UTC