- From: Andrew Oakley <andrew@ado.is-a-geek.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:49:37 +0100
- To: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
As far as I can tell when the user agent discards a Document in the session history may change the contents of the history. This seems wrong to me because it makes non-deterministic visible to scripting. The scenario that I'm thinking of is: "index" has a frame that is navigated to: "container" which has a frame that is navigated to: "page1" (default using src=page1) "page2" The "joint session history" now contains (elements in parenthesis are removed because they are "current entries in their respective session histories"): (index) (container) page1 page2 If "container" is now navigated to "empty" we get this: (index) container empty Now if we go back() and the Document for "container" has not been discarded and therefore the nested browsing context exists we get page2 visible in the frame and this joint session history: (index) (container) page1 page2 empty If the Document for "container" had been discarded then the nested browsing context and it's session history is discarded. This means that page1 is visible in the frame and we get this joint session history: (index) (container) page1 empty Apologies if the above description is confusing, it's rather difficult to describe. I have not managed to find a way to get desktop browsers to actually discard the Document for "container", I'm guessing there is some sort of heuristic based on memory available. In a memory-constrained environment a browser may wish to destroy the Document's fairly quickly and I expect to see the second behaviour. Have I missed something or misunderstood the spec here? As far as I can tell there is actually no requirement to maintain session history for any nested browsing context that belongs to a document which is not active but the major browser do. Thanks -- Andrew Oakley -- Andrew Oakley
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 14:50:02 UTC