Re: [whatwg] Blurry lines in 2D Canvas (and SVG)

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We're getting a bit off track here :-)
>>
>
> We're figuring out an unclear use case.  That's as on-track as it gets.  :)
>
>
>> No, you need to scale, otherwise the content of your canvas won't scale
>> up.
>> For instance, if you have a 100x100 device pixel rect, it has to become a
>> 110x110 device pixel rect if you zoom by 10%
>>
>
> Okay, that wasn't clear to me.  Pixel ratios are peripheral to what you're
> describing: you could ask for the same thing any time you're rendering to a
> dynamically-sized canvas, which simplifies the discussion.  I don't know if
> a complex semi-antialiasing mode is a good approach, though.  It'll always
> have issues (rounded corners won't "connect" cleanly; it's not clear if it
> works for fills, or if it works for patterned fills).
>
> I don't know if this would work well in practice, or if it's
> implementable, but here's a two-part approach that might work:
>
> - First, add the inner and/or outer stroke modes.  This seems useful in
> and of itself, but the purpose here is to make it so integer coordinates
> give hard edges, whether or not you have a 1px stroke.
>

I'm unsure why this is a requirement... (Not that it wouldn't be nice to
have)


> - Second, add a mode which causes coordinates to be snapped to integers.
>  This would happen when you make the API call, and be applied after the
> canvas transform.
>
> If you're in scale(1.25), and you call rect(100, 100, 75, 75), it would
> draw a rect from 100x100 to 194x194, instead of to 193.75x193.75.
>

You probably mean 125x125 to 194x194. Also, if there's a stroke width of 1,
it would stay the same thickness.
Basically, Canvas would draw artwork like CSS does. A 1 pixel line would
stay 1 pixel until the pixel ratio is 2.


>
> This would give clean output for rounded edges, since you're adjusting the
> size of the path as a whole.  It would work for fills (which also get
> aliased edges when transformed).  It also works if the fill is a pattern,
> where turning off antialiasing would make the pattern ugly.
>

I *think* you only want to do it for strokes because otherwise you might
get seams.

Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 16:25:19 UTC