- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:17:35 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Nathan Broadbent <nathan.f77@gmail.com>, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>, Oliver Hunt <oliver@apple.com>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@chromium.org>
- Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Nathan Broadbent wrote: > > The current information passed to window.onerror rarely provides > sufficient information to find the cause of the error. The column number > argument will be a big step forward, but a stack trace would be > especially useful. I would like to add my support for improving the > window.onerror arguments, with a fifth argument for stack trace. Is > there anything that James or I could do to move this discussion along? This seems useful, but I don't think it's specific to window.onerror. I would recommend approaching the es-discuss list about this. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 17:17:59 UTC