- From: Igor Minar <iminar@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 23:11:48 -0700
- To: whatwg@whatwg.org
The current url resolution as described<http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#resolving-urls>in the spec results in some unhelpful behavior when the following combination of web technologies are used in a client-side web app: - a combination of path-relative urls (<a href="relative/url/to/somewhere">link</a>) and fragment/anchor urls (<a href="#anchorUrl">link</a>) - history.pushState - used for deep-linking - base[href] - used to properly resolve the relative urls to the root of the application in various deployment environments Once history.pushState is used to change location.href, the path-relative urls resolve correctly as expected against the base[href], but anchor urls that are only useful if resolved against the current document.baseURI also unsurprisingly resolve against the base[href]. This behavior makes them unsuitable for this kind of applications which is a big loss in developers toolbox and in fact breaks existing web features like svg that depend on anchor urls to reference nodes in the current document. Does anyone have thoughts on how one could build a client-side app that can be deployed in various contexts without any special server-side templating or build-time pre-processing? The base element looks like a perfect solution for this, if only it didn't break anchor urls.
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 06:12:34 UTC