- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 01:01:00 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > > > It's probably simple enough for authors to check valueAsNumber is not > > NaN and then have them set it to the value they want as the default, > > if they're calling the stepUp/stepDown methods. I've left this as > > throwing if the value isn't a number. > > *All* behavior of stepUp/stepDown is easy enough for authors to work > around to cover cases where they don't agree with the spec. > > But if they have to, I don't see why they wouldn't simply not use > stepUp/stepDown and implement whatever functionality that they want. Fair point. Fixed. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2013 01:01:26 UTC