Re: [whatwg] Forms-related feedback

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >
> > It's probably simple enough for authors to check valueAsNumber is not 
> > NaN and then have them set it to the value they want as the default, 
> > if they're calling the stepUp/stepDown methods. I've left this as 
> > throwing if the value isn't a number.
> 
> *All* behavior of stepUp/stepDown is easy enough for authors to work 
> around to cover cases where they don't agree with the spec.
>
> But if they have to, I don't see why they wouldn't simply not use 
> stepUp/stepDown and implement whatever functionality that they want.

Fair point. Fixed.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Saturday, 19 January 2013 01:01:26 UTC