- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:04:19 -0800
- To: public-canvas-api@w3.org, whatwg@whatwg.org
- Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, schneider@jancona.com
All, so after talking to Dirk, maybe it's better to rename the classes so Path is the one that has the geometry and StyledPath contains the region. Prototype IDL: [Constructor, Constructor(path), // creates a copy Constructor(DOMString)] //takes SVG path syntax interface Path { }; Path implements CanvasPathMethods; [Constructor, Constructor(Path, CanvasWindingRule = "nonzero"), // creates a copy of path Constructor(DomString text, CanvasDrawingSTyles, SVGMatrix?, unrestricted double , unrestricted double , optional unrestricted double)] interface StyledPath { StyledPath Transform(matrix); // returns a transformed path StyledPath Stroke(CanvasDrawingStyles); // returns a stroked path StyledPath Add(StyledPath); // returns a path that is the union of the 2 paths boolean isPointInPath(unrestricted double x, unrestricted double y); }; interface CanvasRenderingContext2D { .... void Fill(StyledPath); } dictionary HitRegionOptions { StyledPath? path = null; .... } Any comments? On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I completely agree with you. > As specified today, hit regions don't have support for winding. In fact, > it is even worse: if you have a set of drawing commands, you can't get > their region. > The reason for this is that the path object (as currently defined) simply > accumulates path segments. This will wreak havoc with shapes that touch or > that have strokes. > > I have stated this a couple of times already on whatwg... > What I would like to see is more like this: > > class PathSink implements CanvasPathMethods { > PathSink(); > PathSink(DOMString); //takes SVG path syntax > } > > class Path { > Path(); > Path(PathSink, CanvasWindingRule = "nonzero"); > Path(DomString text, CanvasDrawingSTyles...); // to get text outline > > Path Transform(matrix Transformation); > Path Stroke(...); > > Path Add(Path); // <---- > } > > > The 'Add' method would not simply aggregate path segments. Instead, the > area of resulting path will be a union. > > So, for example, if you want to create a region with a stroke rectangle: > > var h = new PathSink(); > h.rect(100, 100, 200, 200); > var P = new Path(h); > P = P.Add(P.Stroke({'lineWidth': 10})); > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Simon Sarris <simon.sarris@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Before we comment on your proposal I have some notes I'd like to share >> because the current *fillRule *rules in the specification seem >> incomplete or at least ill-defined. >> >> The new hit regions use a *Path* in the *HitRegionOptions* (the argument >> to *addHitRegion*) in order to function, but its not clear what fill >> rule these *Path* objects are using for hit-testing. Even-odd and >> winding fill rules create different holes in a path, so it matters a good >> deal for hit testing. >> >> There seem to be three possibilities as implemented: >> >> 1. HitRegions only ever use winding paths. This seems like a bad idea. >> 2. Whichever *fillRule* is defined when *context.addHitRegion* is >> called determines the *fillRule *for that hit region's *Path *permanently. >> This seems acceptable but confusing and should be clarified if it is >> currently the case. >> 3. The fillRule of a hit region changes dynamically as * >> context.fillRule* changes. This would be a nightmare. >> >> >> I hope it is #2, but the specification makes no mention of this. >> >> Actually, I'd prefer that either *HitRegionOptions *or the *Path *object >> would need to have a *fillRule *attribute. >> >> If the specification does adopt something similar to Cabanier's >> suggestions then that would need to be done anyway. >> >> In short, if *isPointInPath *is changed to specify *fillRule*, * >> HitRegionOptions* (the argument to *addHitRegion*) or the *Path* given >> in the options needs to change too. >> >> >> Simon Sarris >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> there was a recent discussion on adding winding rules to canvas. As you >>> may know until now, canvas only supported even-odd winding. >>> Maybe graphics libraries and SVG also support non-zero winding.[1][2] >>> >>> Mozilla exposes this currently with 'mozFillRule'. Making this part of >>> the graphics state has several drawbacks. >>> The biggest is that fill/clip will now have to check the state every >>> time, or set/reset it. Winding is also part of path geometry. >>> >>> I have the following proposal: >>> >>> enum CanvasWindingRule { "nonzero", "evenodd" }; >>> void fill(optional CanvasWindingRule w = "nonzero"); >>> void clip(optional CanvasWindingRule w = "nonzero"); >>> boolean isPointInPath(unrestricted double x, unrestricted double y, >>> optional CanvasWindingRule w = "nonzero"); >>> >>> >>> proposed patches for this API can be found here: >>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105508 >>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=827053 >>> >>> What do people think? >>> >>> 1: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/painting.html#FillRuleProperty >>> 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonzero-rule >>> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 23:04:44 UTC