- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:14:51 +0100
- To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
- Cc: Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org>, whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Eric Seidel <eric@webkit.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> wrote: >>> Okay, so event path would be (in tree order): >>> >>> <a> -- [shadow root] -> .. -> <insertion point> -- <b> -- [shadow >>> root] -> .. -> <c> >>> >>> In this case, the adjustment happens twice, at <b> and <a>. >> >> Normally with <b> being a child of <a> there would not be any >> adjustment. > > Yup. I don't understand whether you're just agreeing with me or disagreeing :) > > With shadow trees in place, we need to let them react to events > happening in nodes, distributed to insertion points. Is there any adjustment if offset* are computed on getting anyway? (Calling it adjustment if there's no actual adjustment (they're just relative to target) seems wrong.) -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 19:15:16 UTC