- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:55:11 +0100
- To: Gryllida <gryllida@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Gryllida <gryllida@gmail.com> schrieb am Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:01:26 +1030: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:24:58 +0100 > Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils@dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote: > > > Gryllida <gryllida@gmail.com> schrieb am Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:26:00 > > +1030: > > > > > == Summary == > > > To have some universal, standard protocol to indicate that a > > > webpage or website has an IRC channel or network associated with > > > it. > > > > Associated in what form? Which verb describles the relationship > > between the web page and the IRC channel? Also, I would call the > > link relation „chat“ or something, there are other protocols than > > IRC, e.g. XMPP. -- > > Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann > > <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net> > > Probably associated as in 'have', that a page/site 'has' its channel > somewhere. Acknowledge XMPP support in that, might need a 'protocol' > attribute or just an xmpp:// URL? “to have” as you use it .ust denotes a relationship exists (as in “I have a sister.”), but not which one. My fault, the question should have been “What noun describes the IRC channel in relation to the web page?”. For a feed, for example, this can be answered with „this is an alternate representation of the content“. A protocol attribute for <link> elements would be totally hilarious. -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 04:55:43 UTC