W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2013

Re: [whatwg] inputmode feedback

From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:36:16 +0900
To: Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁) <kochi@google.com>
Message-ID: <20131216093615.GI32206@sideshowbarker>
Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
[trimming the Cc list, assuming everybody's subscribed to whatwg@lists.whatwg.org]

"Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁)" <kochi@google.com>, 2013-12-09 16:18 +0900:

> The point that Yoichi wanted to make was to extract IME-related part of
> 'intputmode' spec and move out of inputmode, or at least separate the
> discussion about IME-related modes and other modes, otherwise the
> discussion will never go anywhere.
> How about using this bug as a starting point of the discussion (although
> it's on w3c bugzilla)?
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23961
> Ben Bucksh (cc'ed) pointed out in the bug entry that inputmode has at
> least 3 aspects (script/language, data type, typing aid).  There is room
> for discussion whether we should split inputmode into every orthogonal
> modes, but whether we split or not, we would like to separate discussion
> whether each mode is good or not into these categories.

As I commented in bug 23961, the value of the inputmode attribute was
originally specified as taking a list of tokens, where one token is
optionally the name of a script like "latin" and the rest of the tokens
were optional modifiers.

So you could imagine a value like inputmode="latin titlecase prediction".

I'm not saying I think the use cases actually merit changing the inputmode
microsyntax to be a list of tokens like that. But it might be preferable to
introducing yet more attributes.


Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 09:36:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:14 UTC