- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:37:55 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
- Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > > The gist of the argument was that we should let UAs decide how they want > to design controls and avoid limiting their options by standardizing > behavior of pseudo-elements. I'm not suggesting that we define the actual bindings. Just that we describe some of the components that native bindings might use. For example, a type=number control could have a ::value pseudo and a ::button pseudo, and the ::value would match the text editing area, and the ::button would match the up and down buttons -- except on platforms that replace the whole control with just a text control that pops up a spinner, in which case the ::button wouldn't match anything. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 23:38:21 UTC