- From: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:36:38 -0700
- To: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
- Cc: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On 8/30/13, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 30, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Yoav Weiss wrote: >>>> [...] >> >> They are fairly common, especially for loading of "mobile" UI components >> (e.g. jquery mobile). They can also be used to download dynamic page >> components (e.g. maps) only on larger devices. >> But, unless adding `media` to script elements is relatively simple, I >> think >> that this use-case can be resolved by using the media attribute on <rel >> subresource>, in combination with ES6 modules or a custom script loader. >> As >> far as I understand it, all <link> elements can have a media attribute >> [1], >> so this is simply an implementation issue. > > I don't think it'll be hard to add the media attribute on the script element > at least in WebKit. > > It'll be much harder to implement a new dependency API that replies on CSS > selectors if we care about the performance at all. > What is this in response to? What dependency API that relies on CSS selectors? (I'm assuming you mean relies and not replies, but still not sure what you mean). -- Garrett Twitter: @xkit personx.tumblr.com
Received on Friday, 30 August 2013 23:37:41 UTC