- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:46:51 +0100
- To: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
- Cc: felash@gmail.com
Having Notification.get() makes associating state more desirable, but even in its absence we have requests to store arbitrary state on Notifications object. We could have a mechanism similar to pushState() to store such state. It's kinda similar to having data-* on elements. My main worry is that we'll end up with many parallel communication channels, but given that the complexity seems relatively low that might not necessarily be bad. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 30 August 2013 14:47:19 UTC