- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:33:27 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Jeremie Patonnier <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Jeremie Patonnier > <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com> wrote: >> The spec define two static methods: `requestPermission` and `get` >> I'm a bit puzzled because `requestPermission` expect a callback function >> where `get` return a `Promise`. > > It's not clear to me we can change the design of requestPermission() > at this point. I think end-user notifications have been shipping for a > while now... We could maybe upgrade it at some point to also return a > promise, dunno. If a function currently takes a callback argument and returns void, it's trivial to upgrade it to instead make the callback optional and return a promise when it's not passed. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 23 August 2013 16:34:17 UTC