- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 08:25:46 +0300
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
2013-08-08 0:08, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: >> 2013-08-06 17:45, Ian Hickson wrote: >> >>>> If such an application needs some bulk of text data, it can be >>>> included e.g. in <script type=text/plain>...</script> but not in a >>>> separate plain text file (included into the application >>>> distribution, along with other files) referred to via <script >>>> src=...></script>. This is a frustrating restriction and makes it >>>> more difficult to maintain and customize application. If an external >>>> plain text file could be used, the data content could be separately >>>> managed (requiring knowledge only about the format used). >>> >>> I'm not sure what you mean by "application distribution". Why can't a >>> text/plain file by included the same way an image/png file is >>> included? >> >> It can be included as a file, but it cannot be used. I can't "read" it. >> That is the point. I can use an <img> element referring to an image >> file, but I cannot refer to a simple plain text file (or an XML file) in >> an HTML document in a manner that lets me process its content in >> scripting. I can only include it via <iframe> or <object>, but that's >> different from accessing its content. > > I don't understand why XHR doesn't work for you. Because there is no server to talk to when you’re a truly local HTML5 application. Yucca
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2013 05:26:10 UTC