- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 17:02:07 -0500
- To: Chang Shu <cshu01@gmail.com>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, kg@luminance.org
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Chang Shu <cshu01@gmail.com> wrote: > If we plan to enhance the Encoding spec, I personally prefer a new pair of BinaryDecoder/BinaryEncoder, which will be less confusing than reusing > TextDecoder/TextEncoder. > I disagree with the idea of adding a new method for something that behaves exactly like something we already have, just to give it a different name. (It may not be too late to rename those functions, if nobody has implemented them yet, but I'm not convinced it's much of a problem.) -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 22:02:32 UTC