- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 19:27:03 +0300
- To: whatwg@whatwg.org
2013-08-06 17:45, Ian Hickson wrote: >> If such an application needs some bulk of text data, it can be included >> e.g. in <script type=text/plain>...</script> but not in a separate plain >> text file (included into the application distribution, along with other >> files) referred to via <script src=...></script>. This is a frustrating >> restriction and makes it more difficult to maintain and customize >> application. If an external plain text file could be used, the data >> content could be separately managed (requiring knowledge only about the >> format used). > > I'm not sure what you mean by "application distribution". Why can't a > text/plain file by included the same way an image/png file is included? It can be included as a file, but it cannot be used. I can't "read" it. That is the point. I can use an <img> element referring to an image file, but I cannot refer to a simple plain text file (or an XML file) in an HTML document in a manner that lets me process its content in scripting. I can only include it via <iframe> or <object>, but that's different from accessing its content. Yucca
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 16:27:30 UTC