- From: Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 17:22:36 -0400
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
- "Let the current column be the first col element child of the colgroup element" is not considered ambiguous because the "colgroup element" mentioned is understood to be "the colgroup element in question" (see the beginning of the step: "If the current element is a colgroup, follow these substeps:"). On the other hand, the phrase "While the node is a so-and-so element, etc." (and the patterns mentioned in my earlier message) is ambiguous because it is not known beforehand what kind of element is involved. (Also, ambiguity issues involving "the first col element child" are moot because, as far as I can tell, an element named "col" in a namespace other than HTML can't be a direct child of an HTML "colgroup" element.) - The tree construction stage is more generic than other HTML algorithms with respect to namespaces, while most of the rest of the spec deals exclusively with the HTML namespace, making confusion much less likely. --Peter -----Original Message----- From: Ian Hickson Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 4:41 PM To: Peter Occil Cc: WHATWG Subject: Re: Namespaces and tag names in the HTML parser On Thu, 1 Aug 2013, Peter Occil wrote: > > Sec. 12.2.4 (Tokenization) [...] I mean not in what is today section 12. For example, where the spec says "Let the current column be the first col element child of the colgroup element". Why is that not ambiguous? Right at the top of the spec it says "Except where otherwise stated, all elements defined or mentioned in this specification are in the HTML namespace ("http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"), and all attributes defined or mentioned in this specification have no namespace.". What I'm confused about is why this is enough for part of the spec, but not other parts of the spec. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 21:23:05 UTC