- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:58:13 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Laurent Perez <l.laurent.p@gmail.com>
- Cc: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Thu, 1 Aug 2013, Laurent Perez wrote: > > The use case is to show a "please wait, loading..." message until all > resources of an index page (js, css, html, images, fonts) are > downloaded. When the message dismisses, the index page is ready for a > non-blocking UI navigation since js was already loaded. > > We plan to implement it in our own user agent, and I was wondering if I > should go the Apple meta way or use the w3c widgets spec and use a > webapp descriptor. I know the widgets spec has been implemented by some > (Opera, Phonegap to describe an hybrid application), I was wondering if > work was still going on on the splash proposal. Why not model applications around the same model as used by G+, where the "splash" is the application itself, just in a non-interactive state? If you can download the splash graphic, you can almost certainly download enough of the app to just show it. Basically, I think you should view as splash screens as much the same way as "installation" -- bugs from a legacy world that we should work hard to avoid reintroducing into the Web platform. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 15:58:37 UTC