- From: David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:31:36 +0200
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Le 29/04/2013 14:44, David Bruant a écrit : > I'm no Caja expert, but this light-Caja might be as simple as picking > a few Caja libraries and wiring them a bit differently. I'll ask the > Caja mailing-list. Which I did and the answers are very interesting: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-caja-discuss/tFhYLJ4abL4/1Mq34zXd_z0J https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-caja-discuss/tFhYLJ4abL4/p0xUcsV99boJ I also read a bit more about the Caja API https://developers.google.com/caja/ and it's all fairly easy to use. As far as I'm concerned, I consider the "independent standard-based widget loading" problem solved through these solutions. Not just solved in theory. Solved in the sense that any dev can easily deploy them and that perf (both startup+runtime) is not too degraded in modern browsers. If someone believes otherwise, please speak up; otherwise, let's forget about "independent widgets" when designing platform APIs? David
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 15:32:14 UTC