W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > September 2012

Re: [whatwg] Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:05:20 -0400
Message-ID: <506262E0.5070501@mit.edu>
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 9/25/12 9:48 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Boris Zbarsky:
>> I guess the question is whether we're more likely to need [Unforgeable]
>> on some other entire interface or whether were more likely to need
>> [Unforgeable] on a single member that's not a readonly attribute.  Of
>> course we might never need either one...
> I'm inclined to simplify now (by moving [Unforgeable] to the interface)
> and worry about it later if we need to.

I guess from my point of view, extending the existing member 
[Unforgeable] to a wider class of members without changing anything else 
about it seems simpler than having two separate meanings to 
[Unforgeable] depending on what it's decorating...  But maybe we're 
thinking about simplicity in different contexts?

(Note we'll still need single-readonly-attribute [Unforgeable] for 
several properties on Window and Document, no matter what we do with 

Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 02:05:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:45 UTC