- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:28:01 +1000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Boris Zbarsky: > I can live with this, but why is this better than just allowing > [Unforgeable] on all operations and attributes and defining an "object > valueOf(); /* returns self */ " on Location? If we really do want to make all Location interface members be unforgeable, then moving the [Unforgeable] up to the interface seems like a nicer way to indicate that. It also means we don't have to pretend we really are defining a useful "valueOf" operation.
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 01:28:36 UTC