- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:23:21 +0000 (UTC)
- To: David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alexandre Morgaut <Alexandre.Morgaut@4d.com>, whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, David Sheets wrote: > > Is there an issue with defining WHATWG-URL syntax as a grammar extension > to the URI syntax in RFC3986? In general, BNF isn't very useful for defining the parsing rules when you also need to handle non-conforming content in a correct manner. Really it is only useful for saying whether or not content is conforming. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 00:26:51 UTC