Re: [whatwg] New URL Standard

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, David Sheets wrote:
> 
> Is there an issue with defining WHATWG-URL syntax as a grammar extension 
> to the URI syntax in RFC3986?

In general, BNF isn't very useful for defining the parsing rules when you 
also need to handle non-conforming content in a correct manner. Really it 
is only useful for saying whether or not content is conforming.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 00:26:51 UTC