W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > September 2012

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

From: Kornel Lesiński <kornel@geekhood.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:15:28 +0100
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Message-ID: <op.wj6n32prte2ec8@aimac.local>
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:05:00 +0100, Chaals McCathieNevile <w3b@chaals.com>  
wrote:

>> While it's unlikely that screen resolution will go above 2x in the near  
>> future, should we be taking into account the zooming of specific  
>> elements that might result in the need for larger artwork? (take icons,  
>> that can scale all the way up to 512px or above)
>
> Or outdoor screens that are 4m x 8m, carrying the same content meant for  
> a TV display and a message to your mobile.
>
> Use cases:
> + emergency information provision, where the sign is acting as a server  
> providing information to all devices that can connect).
> + providing advertising, local information that can be rendered on large  
> outdoor screens, tv-size screens, and for customers.

Those are fine use-cases, but I don't see how do they need anything  
special in relation to zooming/pixel density.

It seems to me that despite large physical size, outdoor screens are not  
unusual, because due to larger viewing distance the actual perceived size  
and pixel density isn't very different from normal screens.

For example the famous display ads in Piccadilly Circus in London have  
easily noticeable pixels, so they're merely a "1x" screen, not even "2x"  
yet.

-- 
regards, Kornel
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 22:16:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:45 UTC