W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > September 2012

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for HTML5: Motion sensing input device (Kinect, SoftKinetic, Asus Xtion)

From: Jesús Ruiz García <jesusruiz2007@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:26:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAB0Z=rxx6KgxH-kq3nA0oa=xHr7VXBcqqbNpZ25nTcrPDGQ+SA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org
Hello Ian, and thank you for considering my proposal ;)

I do not know if my proposal should go in getUserMedia() specifications, It's
something that you know better than I, but I would like to take into
account some
details:
- canvas support or any technology that could be drawn on the screen.
- navigation by gestures or voice.
- scanning capability of the human body: to store clothes and other more
specialized sites in these issues.

I think with these capabilities, accomplish more quality and usability on
websites.

It is hard work, especially for giving support in all systems.

Before leaving, how could I add this proposal to the wiki?. I guess I have
to register, because I see the possibility to Login.
Anyway, I usually go by the IRC channel, so we can talk in #whatwg channel.

Best regards and thanks for everything.

*Jesús Ruiz
jesusruiz@php.net
jesusruiz2007@gmail.com*

2012/8/30 Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>

> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Jesús Ruiz García wrote:
> >
> > My proposal for HTML5 is to make it functional with Kinect, SoftKinetic,
> > Asus Xtion, and similar devices to interact with the web.
>
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> >
> > The ability to capture sound and video from the user's devices and
> > manipulate it in the page is already being exposed by the getUserMedia
> > function.  Theoretically, a Kinect can provide this information.
> >
> > More advanced functionality like Kinect's depth information probably
> > needs more study and experience before we start thinking about adding it
> > to the language itself.
>
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> >
> > If we were going to support anything like this, I think the best
> > approach would be to have a new track type that getUserMedia can return
> > in a MediaStream, containing depth buffer data.
>
> This seems like a solid approach. I recommend that further work on this
> happen in the WebRTC mailing lists where the getUserMedia() spec lives.
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Jesús Ruiz García wrote:
> >
> > Seeing that my proposal has not been completely rejected, could I add
> > this to the Category: Proposals for the Wiki?:
> > http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Category:Proposals
>
> Sure, but the mailing lists are what matter at the end of the day. :-)
>
> --
> Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 1 September 2012 17:26:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:45 UTC