- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:55:52 -0500
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:21 PM, John Tamplin <jat at google.com> wrote: > I assumed the point Kenneth was making that you objected to was that if > you had Uint16BEArray and Uint16LEArray, so you could have both native > (with Uint16Array being one of them) and specific endian-ness was that you > are introducing polymorphic calls. > Well, I hadn't suggested having both BE and LE versions of views yet at that point, but I don't think it matters there, either. Introducing those types won't automatically cause code to start using them--code that only needs a particular endianness will still only need one. But making the existing views always LE wouldn't increase the amount of polymorphic calls at all, it'd just change the behavior of the existing calls. -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 18:55:52 UTC